Obligatory Nick Punto Post

February 12, 2010 by Dan · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Roster Analysis 

Happy Nick Punto Day!

I’m not going to write anything very long, but I’m going to share my opinion on The Puntz (pronounced ‘Poontz’). While it’s fun to poke fun at the guy, Punto has actually been and important member of the team over the past five/six years or so. He can play any infield position, and he plays them well. Now, with Carlos Gomez gone, he might now be the Twins only source of SportsCenter highlight-reel plays!

Offensively, it’s hard to look past his dismal 2007 season. If you do, though, you’d see a guy who tried to get on base any way he can. He walks a ton and sees an above average number of pitches per at-bat. I’m a big supporter of the theory that not making an out is the most important job of any batter. The Puntz definitely handles that part of the job well, power and batting average be damned.

If we see Nick Punto starting at third base and batting ninth this season (or until Valencia is ready), I’m totally okay with it.

Winter Thoughts

February 3, 2010 by Dan · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Off-season, Roster Analysis 

I’ve been meaning to post something for most of the winter, but I’ve just been too busy. Adjusting to the 9-to-5 grind while planning a wedding takes a lot out of you!

Anyways, I guess I have a bit to write about. First things first: Joe Mauer. I started to type up a post about how a large Mauer contract might not be good for the Twins, and how they might be able to put together a better team overall by spending that money on other players. But then I became too depressed and didn’t finish it (actually, I just ran out of time and forgot about it). As of right now, it sounds like Joe and his agent are in deep talks with Bill Smith and something will be finalized before spring training starts. Sure, it might end up being a lot of years for a catcher, but I think Joe Mauer is special enough to warrant it.

And then we have the infield situation. As of right now, second base will be manned by Punto/Casilla and third base will be covered by Harris/Punto. Prospect Danny Valencia is rumored to be close to MLB ready, and we could see him after the all-star break. I’m not so sure I’m as high on him as other fans are: 1) his defense seems to be average-to-good, but reports are conflicting 2) He has terrible plate discipline in AAA and strikes out a bit. I fear that will translate to a dismal MLB hitting line. However, there isn’t much out there that constitutes as a long term fix for the position. Had the Twins been able to get Kevin Kouzmanoff from the Padres (he’s sinceĀ  been traded to the A’s), he could had been a decent solution. The more I think about it though, he seems to have a pretty similar skill set to Valencia, and is more expensive. For now, I’m okay with giving Harris a shot at starting. He’s not a terrible hitter and might benefit from regular at bats.

At second, the Twins have been tied to free agent Orlando Hudson. I’m an advocate of a short-term deal with him. He’s getting a little long in the tooth, but we have Nick Punto ready to go in case something happens to Hudson. If the Twins do sign Orlando, however, that would probably mean Casilla is as good as gone. Casilla had some great minor league numbers up to and including the AA level. However, something has been lost in translation from AA to AAA and the majors. It’s sad to see raw talent like that not pan out.

Francisco Liriano. I call him “Franchise” when he’s doing well, and “‘Cisco” when he’s not. He’s been ‘Cisco for a while now, but that could change this season. Reports were coming out of the Dominican Republic that he was “throwing the living fire out of the ball” (thanks Gardy). I’m usually pretty skeptical of third hand evaluations like that (wasn’t he throwing in the mid-90′s before last season too?!?!) but many other bloggers watched the championship game in which he pitched and the consensus is that his monster slider is back. I’m cautiously optimistic, but how awesome would it be to have Franchise back to, or near, 2006 form? Yes Please.